Matthew Lipman and Ann Margaret Sharp: Philosophy for Children's Educational Revolution (Paperback, 2023)

Preface (2 pages).- Chapter 1- Intellectual-biographical sketch (7 pages).- (A) Matthew Lipman’s early years (1923-1972).- (B) Ann Margaret Sharp’s early years (1942-1972).- (C) Lipman and Sharp’s providential meeting in 1973.- (D) Four decades of fruitful cooperation (1973-2010).- References. - Chapter 2 ? The context of Lipman and Sharp’s educational revolution (7 pages).- (A) The 1960s: political and social tensions in the US.- (B) The widespread need for educational renovation.- (C) Philosophy’s contribution to education?.- References.- Chapter 3 ? Lipman and Sharp’s philosophical-educational vision (35 pages).- (A) “Inside-out philosophy”.- (B) The challenge of democracy and citizenship.- (C) Cognitive self-defence and community-based philosophical enquiry.- (D) Education for reasonableness, reflectivity, fallibilism and self-correction.- (E) The multidimensionality of thinking: critical, creative and caring.- (F) Moral education, reduction of violence, appreciation of diversities.- References.- Chapter 4 ? Philosophy for Children’s educational curriculum (22 pages).- (A) The first novel: “Harry Stottlemeier’s Discovery” (1969).- (B) The demand for empirical evaluation.- (C) The foundation of the Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children (IAPC) and the development of the educational curriculum.- (D) Training supervisors and teachers.- References.- Chapter 5 ? Philosophy for Children’s global dissemination (27 pages).- (A) Where: USA, Canada, Latin America, Africa, Europe, Asia.- (B) The reasons of P4C’s worldwide success.- The effectiveness of philosophy’s contribution to education.-  The efficacy of P4C’s community-based proposal.- P4C’s methodological awareness and adaptability.- P4C’s ability to cope with present-day educational challenges related to the globalised and digital age: responsibility, empowerment, interculturality, learnification.- (C) Critical and comparative remarks.- Criticisms of the P4C curriculum.- A comparison between P4C and other philosophical-educational practices.- References.- Conclusions: An open-ended educational proposal (2 pages).