Philosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality (Paperback, 1)

Introduction: Gripping with the myth of neutrality Mirko Farina and Andrea Lavazza??Part 1: Defining Expertise??1. Trustworthy experts and untrustworthy experts: Insights from the cognitive psychology of expertise Andrew J. Waters and Fernand Gobet??2. Covid-19 and denialism: A primer on cognitive psychology for science communicators and policymakers Andrea Lavazza and Mirko Farina??3. Do we still need experts? Nick Brancazio and Neil Levy??4. Hypocritical experts Duncan Pritchard??5. The epistemic authority of practice Dylan Mirek Popowicz??Part 2: Expertise in Action??6. Reimagining expertise and neutrality toward epistemic justice in research, clinical translation, and policy: A perspective from neuroethics Anna Nuechterlein, Quinn Boyle, and Judy Illes??7. Expertise in action: Insights from Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Olivia Brown, Nicola Power, Neil Shortland, and Julie Gore??8. What the pandemic showed us about reason and values Ulrike Hahn and Stephan Lewandowsky??9. The priests of the biomedical religion: Against a flawed understanding of experts Ralf J. Jox??10. Scarce resource allocation during infectious disease outbreaks: A communitarian perspective Xiaozheng Yang and Yali Cong??Part 3: Expertise and its Values in the New World??11. Legal expertise and its subject matter within common law adjudication John Coggon??12. The revolution of (neuroscience) experts in the courtroom? Ilaria Zampieri, Matteo Pirisi, and Pietro Pietrini??13. When the politics of contextuality (can) subvert science: A case study of Australian women’s perceptions of alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk Kristen Foley, Belinda Lunnay, and Paul R. Ward??14. The post-truth challenge to expertise Douglas V. Porpora??15. Expertise for a New World: Is bioarchaeology fit for purpose? Charlotte A. Roberts