History of Linguistics (Multiple-component retail product)

History of Linguistics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics

Edited by John E. Joseph

Volume 1: Ancient Europe and Asia

Contents

Acknowledgements

Introduction: Bounding the history of linguistics (John E. Joseph)

1. Deborah Levine Gera, ‘The Invention of Language’, in Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 112-181.
2. Anneli Luhtala, ‘On Definitions in Ancient Grammar’, in Pierre Swiggers & Alphons Wouters (eds), Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity (Leuven & Paris: Peeters (Orbis Supplementa, 2002), pp. 257-285.
3. Daniel J. Taylor, ‘Rewriting the History of Linguistics in Classical Antiquity’, in Gerda Hassler and Gesina Volkmann (eds), History of Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XI), 28 August-2 September 2008, Potsdam (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011), pp. 109-125.
4. Norman Kretzmann, ‘History of Semantics’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, (New York: Macmillan, 1967), pp. 358-406.
5. J. F. Staal, ‘Sanskrit Philosophy of Language’, in Hermann Parret (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1976), pp. 102-136.
6. Christoph Harbsmeier, ‘Traditional Chinese Comments on Language’, and ‘The Art of Grammar in Traditional China’, excerpts in Joseph Needham (ed.) Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7, Part I: Language and Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 46-54, 85-95.
7. William S-Y. Wang and 王士元. ‘Language in China: A Chapter in the History of Linguistics / ???言??展的?史回?’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17, 2, 1989, 183-222.
8. Roy Andrew Miller, ‘The Japanese Linguistic Tradition and the Chinese Heritage’, in Sylvain Auroux et al (eds), History of the Language Sciences (Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2000), pp. 72-77.
9. Jonathan Owens, ‘History’, in Jonathan Owens (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 451-471.
10. Wout Jac van Bekkum, ‘Hebrew’, in The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997), pp. 3-47.

Volume 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance

11. L. G. Kelly, ‘Vox, Articulation and Porphyry’, The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002), pp. 1-38.
12. Irene E. Zwiep, ‘The Hebrew Linguistic Tradition of the Middle Ages’, Histoire-Epistemologie-Langage 18, 1, 1996, 41-61.
13. Geoffrey Bursill-Hall, ‘The Grammatical Theories and Techniques of the Modistae’, in Speculative Grammar in the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of Partes Orationis of the Modistae (The Hague: Mouton, 1972), pp. 37-65.
14. Umberto Eco, Excerpt on ‘Dante’s De vulgari eloquentia’, in The Search for the Perfect Language, translated by James Fentress (Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell, 1995 [1993]), pp. 34-52.
15. Anneli Luhtala, ‘Pedagogical Grammars before the 18th Century’, in Keith Allan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 341-358.
16. R. H. Robins, ‘The Byzantine Grammarians’. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 51, 1998, 29-38.
17. Mark Amsler, ‘Premodern Letters and Textual Consciousness from the Pre-Socratics to the First Grammatical Treatise’, Historiographia Linguistica 37, 2010, 279-319.
18. Vivien Law, ‘The Renaissance: Discovery of the Outer World’, in The History of Linguistics in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 210-257.
19. Jeffrey Wollock, ‘Moisture and the Tongue in the Renaissance’, in The Noblest Animate Motion: Speech, Physiology, and Medicine in Pre-Cartesian Linguistic Thought (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997), pp. 231-260.
20. Wendy Ayres-Bennett, ‘Reading the Remarqueurs: Changing Perceptions of "Classic" Texts’. Historiographia Linguistica 33, 3, 2006, 263-302.
21. Noam Chomsky, ‘Creative Aspect of Language Use’ in Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rational Thought, 3^rd ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 2009 [1966]), pp. 59-77.
22. Noam Chomsky, ‘Deep and Surface Structure’, in Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rational Thought, 3^rd ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 2009 [1966]), pp. 78-92.
23. Vivian Salmon, ‘Review of Cartesian Linguistics’, Journal of Linguistics 5, 1, 1969, 165-187.
24. Robin Lakoff, ‘Review of Herbert H. Brekle (ed.), Grammaire generale et raisonnee’, Language 45, 1969, 343-364.
25. W. Keith. Percival, ‘On the Non-Existence of Cartesian Linguistics’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Cartesian Studies (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972), pp. 137-145.
26. Otto Zwartjes, ‘Missionary Linguistics in Japan’, in Portuguese Missionary Grammars in Asia, Africa and Brazil, 1550-1800 (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011), pp. 93-142.

Volume 3: Enlightenment through 19th Century

27. Talbot J. Taylor, ‘On How We Ought to Understand’, in Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation (Duke University Press, 1992), pp. 27-47.
28. Hans Aarsleff, ‘Condillac’s Speechless Statue’, Studia Leibnitzia, supplementa xv, 1975, 287-302.
29. Julie Tetel Andresen, ‘In the Beginning: The Political Conception of Language’, in Linguistics in America, 1769-1924: A Critical History (London & New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 22-67.
30. Hilary Chappell and Alain Peyraube. ‘The History of Chinese Grammars in Chinese and Western Scholarly Traditions’, Language and History 57, 2, 2015, 107-136.
31. Matthew Lauzon, ‘Welsh Indians and Savage Scots: History, Antiquarianism, and Indian Languages in 18th-century Britain’, History of European Ideas, 34, 3, 2008, 250-269.
32. Christiane Schlaps, ‘The "Genius of Language": Transformations of a Concept in the History of Linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica 31, 2-3, 2004, 367-388.
33. Thomas R. Trautmann, ‘Discovering Aryan and Dravidian in British India: A Tale of Two Cities’, Historiographia Linguistica 31, 1, 2004, 33-58.
34. Micaela Verlato, ‘The Challenge of Polysynthesis: Wilhelm von Humboldt and Early Comparative Americanist Linguistics’, Language and History 58, 2, 2016, 82-94.
35. James Turner, ‘From Philology to Linguistics, 1800-1850’, in Philology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014), pp. 125-146.
36. Michel Foucault, ‘Bopp’ and ‘Language Become Object’, excerpts from The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, anon. trans. (London & New York: Routledge, 2005 [1966]), pp. 305-329.
37. Tuska Benes, ‘Comparative Linguistics: Race, Religion, and Historical Agency, 1830-1880’, In Babel’s Shadow: Language, Philology, and the Nation in Nineteenth Century Germany (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2008), pp. 197-239.
38. Holger Pedersen, ‘The Study of Non-Indo-European Families of Languages’, in The Discovery of Language: Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931), 99-140.
39. Stephen G. Alter, ‘Darwin and the Linguists: The Coevolution of Mind and Language. Part 1. Problematic Friends’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38, 2007, 573-584.
40. Stephen G. Alter, ‘Darwin and the Linguists: The Coevolution of Mind and Language’, Part 2. The Language-thought Relationship’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, 2008, 38-50.
41. N. E. Collinge, ‘History of Historical Linguistics’, in E. F. K. Koerner and R. E. Asher (eds), Concise History of the Language Sciences (Oxford: Pergamon, 1992), pp. 203-212.
42. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘Concluding Remarks’, from ‘European Structuralism: Early Beginnings’, in Thomas A. Sebeok (eds), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 13, Historiography of Linguistics (The Hague: Mouton, 1975), pp. 803-808.

Volume 4: 20^th-21^st Centuries, and the Historiography of Linguistics

43. Giorgio Graffi, ‘European Linguistics Since Saussure’, in Keith Allan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 469-484.
44. Stephen R. Anderson, ‘American Structuralist Phonology’, in Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 277-309.
45. Stephen R. Anderson, ‘Generative Phonology and its Origins’, in Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 310-327.
46. Peter H. Matthews, ‘Bloomfield’s Mature Theory’, and ‘The Post-Bloomfieldians’, excerpts in Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 62-85.
47. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘The Origins of Morphophonemics in American Linguistics’, in Toward a History of American Linguistics (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 209-252.
48. Penny Lee, ‘Metalinguistics: The Intercalibration of Agreement through Language Awareness’, in The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1996), pp. 224-249.
49. James McElvenny, ‘The Application of C. K. Ogden’s Semiotics in Basic English’, Language Problems and Language Planning 39, 2, 2015, 187-204.
50. John E. Joseph, ‘The Origins of American Sociolinguistics’, in From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the History of American Linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002), pp. 107-131.
51. John E. Joseph and Frederick J. Newmeyer, ‘"All Languages Are Equally Complex": The Rise and Fall of a Consensus’, Historiographia Linguistica 39, 2-3, 2012, 341-368.
52. Frederick J. Newmeyer, Stephen R. Anderson, Sandra Chung and James McCloskey, ‘Chomsky’s 1962 Programme for Linguistics: A Retrospective’, in Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective London & New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 66-79.
53. Gregory Radick, ‘The Unmaking of a Modern Synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the Politics of Behaviorism, 1955-1965’, Isis 107, 2016, 49-73.
54. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘The Importance of Linguistic Historiography and the Place of History in Linguistic Science’, Foundations of Language 14, 4, 1976, 541-547.
55. David Cram, ‘Shelf Life and Time Horizons in the Historiography of Linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica 34, 2-3, 2007, 189-212.
56. Els Elffers-van Ketel, ‘Metamethodology’, in The Historiography of Grammatical Concepts: 19th and 20th-century Changes in the Subject-Predicate Conception and the Problem of Their Historical Reconstruction (Amsterdam and Atlanta, Ga.: Rodopi, 1991), pp. 9-26.
57. John E. Joseph, ‘Corpse Puppetry: Anachronisms of Consistency, Continuity and Progress in the History of Linguistics’, History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences, 2015, http://hiphilangsci.net/2015/06/03/salon-anachronism-in-linguistic-historiography/#johnjoseph
58. Stephen O. Murray, ‘"Scientific Revolutions" and Other Kinds of Regime Change’, in Douglas A. Kibbee (ed.), Chomskyan (R)evolutions (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010), pp. 75-102.
59. Pierre Swiggers, ‘Linguistic Historiography: Object, Methodology, Modelization’, Revista Todas as Letras 14, 1, 2012, 38-53.
60. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘Persistent Issues in Linguistic Historiography’, in Professing Linguistic Historiography (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1995), pp. 3-26.

Index