Law and Legal Interpretation (Paperback, 1)

Acknowledgements, Series Preface, Introduction, PART I. INTERPRETATION AND LAW: WHY IS INTERPRETATION IMPORTANT FOR LAW?, 1. ‘Law, Philosophy and Interpretation’, ARSP, 80, pp. 463-75, 2. ‘Why Interpret?’, Ratio Juris, 9, pp. 349-63, PART II. INTERPRETATION AND LEGAL REASONING: LAW AND MORALITY, 3. ‘Law as Practical Reason’, Cambridge Law Journal, 48, pp. 436-71, 4. ‘Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited’, Law and Philosophy, 18, pp. 537-77, 5. ‘A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation’, Southern California Law Review, 58, pp. 277-398, PART III. INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF LEGAL RULES, VAGUENESS AND DEFEASIBILITY, 6. ‘Justification and Application of Norms’, Ratio Juris, 6, pp. 157-70, 7. ‘Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy’s “Special-Case Thesis’” , Ratio Juris, 6, pp. 143-56, 8. ‘Law, Love and Computers’, Edinburgh Law Review, 1, pp. 25-42, 9. ‘On Law and Logic’, Ratio Juris, 9, pp. 331-48, PART IV. LEGAL INTEPRETATION AND POLITICS, 10. ‘Legal Analysis as Institutional Imagination’, Modern Law Review, 59, pp. 1-23, 11. The Inertia of Institutional Imagination: A Reply to Roberto Unger’, Modem Law Review, 59, pp. 377-97, PART V. INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVITY, 12. ‘Law and Metaphysics’, Yale Law Journal, 96, pp. 613-36, 13. ‘Kripke’s Case: Some Remarks on Rules, their Interpretation and Application’, Rechtstheorie, 19, pp. 39-49, 14. ‘Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in Law and Literature’, in Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally, Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 87-102, 559-62, PART VI. INTERPRETING THE LAW, 15. ‘Normative and Narrative Coherence in Legal Decision Making’, ARSP-Beiheft, 69, pp. 194-205, 16. ‘On Justification and Interpretation’, ARSP-Beiheft, 53, pp. 255-68, 17. ‘Authority Reasons in Legal Interpretation and Moral Reasoning’, ARSP Supplementa (III), pp. 144-52, 18. ‘Two Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common-Law Justification’, Cornell Law Review, 63, pp. 707-88, 19. ‘Reasonableness and Objectivity’, Notre Dame Law Review, 74, pp. 1575-603, Name Index