Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity : Misconceptions and Confusion in French Law and Practice (Hardcover)

Introduction Part 1 Crimes Against Humanity: From Nuremberg to Lyon . . . And Back Again 1 Trying Klaus Barbie: Setting a Precedent? 1.1 Crimes Against Humanity and the Victimisation of the Individual 1.2 Systematic Crimes 'in the Name of a State Practising a Policy of Ideological Supremacy' 1.3 Perceiving the Knowledge Requirement 2 Trying Paul Touvier and Maurice Papon: Twisting the Precedent 3 A Problematic Legacy 3.1 Equalising Victims, Confusing Crimes 3.2 Making of Nuremberg a Law of Circumstances Part 2 Punishing Genocide: Too Much To Ask? 4 The Direct Applicability of the Genocide Convention under French Law 5 The Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to the Crime of Genocide 6 The Applicability of Retroactive Criminal Norms 7 The Contemporary Understanding of the Law of Genocide by the French Judiciary: Dualism in Disguise? 8 Concluding Observations Part 3 Why Genocide? 9 Responding to the Incorrect Ill-Qualification of Vichy France in the Touvier and Papon cases 9.1 The Laws of Vichy France: 'An Impeccable Style for an Infinite Horror' 9.2 The Criminal Acts of Vichy France: The Question of Genocidal Intent 9.3 The Criminality of Vichy France: Complicity in Genocide 10 Responding to the Equalisation of Victims in the Barbie Case 11 Genocide: A Crime Against the Family? 11.1 The Legal Destruction of the Family 11.2 The Physical Destruction of the Family 12 Conclusion