The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2019 (Hardcover)

· 제목 : The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2019 (Hardcover) 
· 분류 : 외국도서 > 법률 > 국제법
· ISBN : 9789811621741
· 쪽수 : 371쪽
· 출판일 : 2021-07-29

Sl. No.

Author(s)

Paper title

1

Emeric Prevost and Pratyush Kumar

Regulatory power and the new (im)balance of powers in constitutional liberal democracies: some reflections on the relevance of Norberto Bobbio’s thoughts from an Indian and European perspective

2

Esin Orucu

The Limits and Challenges of Comparativism

3

Gunter Frankenberg

Authoritarian Constitutions: Audience and Purposes

4

Kyriaki Topidi

The Regulation and Governance of Online Hate Speech in the Post-Truth Era: A European Comparative Perspective

5

Markus Kotzur

The Rechtsstaat as a German Concept? ?An Attempt at Contouring and Contextualizing

6

Mathias Siems

The Curious Case of Overfitting Legal Transplants

7

Qianfan Zhang

Does Authoritarian Legality Work for China?

8

Rajesh Kapoor

The Concept ofArbitral Award under the New York Convention: A Comparative Study ofEnglish, French and Indian Approaches

9

Wenjuan Zhang

The Neglecting Side for Studies of Lawyering for Change in China

10

Williams C. Iheme

A comparative assessment of the legal framework on cross-border consumer disputes

11

Arvind Kurian Abraham

Essential Religious Practices Test & The First Amendment: A Comparative Analysis of the Free Exercise of Religion in India and The United States

12

Florian Matthey-Prakash

Public Interest Litigation and Grievance Redressal: Combining “Macromanagement” and “Micromanagement” for Effective Socio-Economic Rights Adjudication

13

Kamala Sankaran

Durham, Dyarchy, and Difference: India’s Constitutional Development

14

Rubanya Nanda

Sustainable Development Component in Model BITs- A Comparative Analysis

15

Ishwara Bhat

Relevance And Significance Of Constituent Assembly Debates In Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis With Reference To Amendments

16

Akhilendra Pratap Singh

“A Call for Order”:Intra-Disciplinary Challenges and ‘Comparative Environmental Law’