logo
logo
x
바코드검색
BOOKPRICE.co.kr
책, 도서 가격비교 사이트
바코드검색

인기 검색어

실시간 검색어

검색가능 서점

도서목록 제공

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law (Paperback, 42, Forty-Second)

Steven L. Emanuel (지은이)
Aspen Publishing
127,550원

일반도서

검색중
서점 할인가 할인률 배송비 혜택/추가 실질최저가 구매하기
114,790원 -10% 0원
3,450원
111,340원 >
yes24 로딩중
교보문고 로딩중
notice_icon 검색 결과 내에 다른 책이 포함되어 있을 수 있습니다.

중고도서

검색중
서점 유형 등록개수 최저가 구매하기
로딩중

eBook

검색중
서점 정가 할인가 마일리지 실질최저가 구매하기
로딩중

책 이미지

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law
eBook 미리보기

책 정보

· 제목 : Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law (Paperback, 42, Forty-Second) 
· 분류 : 외국도서 > 법률 > 헌법
· ISBN : 9798894104263
· 쪽수 : 944쪽
· 출판일 : 2025-03-24

책 소개

ABOUT THE BOOK--TOOLS TO SUCCEED
  • The Capsule Summary provides a quick reference summary of the key concepts covered in the full Outline.
  • The detailed course Outline with black letter principles supplements your casebook reading throughout the semester and gives structure to your own outline.
  • The Quiz Yourselffeature includes a series of short-answer questions and sample answers to help you test your knowledge of the chapter's content.
  • Exam Tips alert you to issues and commonly used fact patterns found on exams.
  • The Casebook Correlation Chart correlates each section in the Outline with the pages covering that topic in the major casebooks.
INCLUDED IN THIS NEW EDITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EMANUEL(R) LAW OUTLINE
Coverage of key 2023-2024 Supreme Court developments, including:
  • Trump v. U.S., holding that Presidents are entitled to at least a presumption of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts. In some contexts, the immunity is absolute, and in others, the President benefits from a strong "presumption of immunity" that will be difficult for the prosecution to rebut.
  • U.S. v. Rahimi, a Second Amendment case, holding that government may restrict certain persons from owning guns. However, the restriction must be "relevantly similar" to restrictions that existed in 1791.
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, indicating that government likely violates the free-expression rights of a social media platform if government enacts an "anti-censorship" rule that requires the platform to include third-party posts that the platform wants to keep off the site.
  • Murthy v. Missouri, a case about standing, holding that a plaintiff does not have standing unless she can show that a favorable outcome in the suit would "redress" the harm from whatever action (usually a government action) the plaintiff is challenging.
이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로,
이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.
이 포스팅은 제휴마케팅이 포함된 광고로 커미션을 지급 받습니다.
도서 DB 제공 : 알라딘 서점(www.aladin.co.kr)
최근 본 책