logo
logo
x
바코드검색
BOOKPRICE.co.kr
책, 도서 가격비교 사이트
바코드검색

인기 검색어

실시간 검색어

검색가능 서점

도서목록 제공

Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R

Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R (Hardcover)

Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza (지은이)
Springer
109,350원

일반도서

검색중
서점 할인가 할인률 배송비 혜택/추가 실질최저가 구매하기
89,660원 -18% 0원
4,490원
85,170원 >
yes24 로딩중
교보문고 로딩중
notice_icon 검색 결과 내에 다른 책이 포함되어 있을 수 있습니다.

중고도서

검색중
서점 유형 등록개수 최저가 구매하기
로딩중

eBook

검색중
서점 정가 할인가 마일리지 실질최저가 구매하기
로딩중

책 이미지

Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R
eBook 미리보기

책 정보

· 제목 : Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R (Hardcover) 
· 분류 : 외국도서 > 과학/수학/생태 > 수학 > 확률과 통계 > 일반
· ISBN : 9783031098383
· 쪽수 : 187쪽
· 출판일 : 2022-11-01

목차

Part I - Introduction to the Bayes Factor (Likelihood Ratio)

Presents the principal statistic discussed throughout this book:  the Bayes factor, in the context of forensic science, more often known as the likelihood ratio.  Subsections of this part:
  • clarify the different roles (known as, respectively, the ‘investigative’ and ‘evaluative’ role) that forensic scientists may assume in their daily work
  • articulate the reasons why forensic scientists should adhere to a Bayesian framework of inference in order to ensure coherence in their inferential and decision-making tasks
  • formally describe what the Bayes factor is and how it relates to coherent decision analysis
  • describe the advantages that Bayes factors offer in assessing, articulating and communicating the value of scientific evidence in general, and in legal proceedings in particular

Part II - Bayes Factor for I
nvestigative Purposes
Deals with a peculiar task of the forensic scientist, known as the ‘investigative mode’ (i.e., one of the two main modes of functioning introduced in Part I). That is, in forensic settings, it may well be the case that a potential source (i.e., a suspect) is not available for comparative purposes, in particular in early stages of the legal process.  Notwithstanding, data and measurements on recovered material (e.g., seized on a crime scene) can be used for an investigative purpose.  In this mode of working, scientists can offer to investigative authorities (or, in a more general perspective, mandating parties) information to help discriminate between general propositions concerning, for instance, the characterizing features of the source that left the recovered material (e.g., gender, externally visible traits such as hair and eye color, handedness, etc.).  At this stage in the process, the scientist tries to help answer questions such
as ‘what  happened?’ in the case under investigation, or ‘what can we infer about the offender?’. In this context, the Bayes factor can be used as a statistic to measure and help decide how to classify, for example, objects and substances on which measurements have been made. This use of the Bayes factor will be explained through practical examples involving topics such as handwriting characteristics, toner from printers in questioned document examination, drugs of abuse, toxicology, forensic anthropology and forensic DNA profiling (listing is not exhaustive and may evolve during the writing of the book).  Both univariate and multivariate data will be considered, with or without replicates, and involving different statistical distributions (i.e. Binomial, Poisson, Normal, etc.).  The examples refer to realistic forensic applications as they may be encountered in judicial contexts and the forensic practitioner’s own field of activity.  Data will be selected from published literature or from the author’s own records.  R sample code will be specified and explanations will be included on how to interpret results in context and convey their meaning appropriately.

Part III - Bayes Factor for Evaluative Purposes
Focuses on the scientist’s role in a more advanced stage of the legal process.  That is, situations in which the evaluation of scientific findings will take into account a potential source of the recovered material (e.g., a suspect or an  object/tool).  This kind of reporting is typically required when scientists need to communicate their results for use at trial.  It is of utmost importance at this juncture that scientists express the value of the observed data and findings under competing hypotheses, focusing on a potential (i.e., known) source versus an  alternative source (e.g., propositions such as ‘the recovered item comes from the same source as the control
material’, and ‘the recovered item is from a source that is different from that of the control material’).  The Bayes factor is the central inferential concept for such expressions of weight of evidence.  In this part of the book, too, examples will be chosen with the intention to reflect realistic scenarios as they may arise in current judicial practice.  In particular, the outline will consider uni- and multi­-variate data from scenarios related to microtraces (e.g., glass and paint fragments), handwriting and drugs of abuse.  Besides computational R code, this chapter will also include (i) sensitivity analyses to provide readers with a means to further investigate the properties of the proposed evaluative procedures based on the Bayes factor, and (ii) decision theoretic extensions to outline how to interface expressions of weight of evidence with the broader perspective of coherent decision-making.  

Part IV - Conclusion
Summarizes the key messages developed throughout this book, emphasizing (i) the contribution of an extended use of the Bayes factor in a normative decision framework, and (ii) the role of the Bayes factor as the relevant statistic for both investigative and evaluative tasks that characterize current forensic science.

이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로,
이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.
이 포스팅은 제휴마케팅이 포함된 광고로 커미션을 지급 받습니다.
도서 DB 제공 : 알라딘 서점(www.aladin.co.kr)
최근 본 책