Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1 (Hardcover, 2016)

Introduction -Leslie Willcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART I. CRITICAL RESEARCH. - Chapter 1: Doolin, B. (1998), "Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems," JIT, Vol. 13, pp. 301-311.- Chapter 2: Brooke, C. (2002), "What does it mean to be 'critical' in IS research?" JIT , Vol. 17, pp. 49-57.- Chapter 3: Brook, C. (2002), "Critical perspectives on information systems; an impression of the research landscape," JIT , Vol. 17, pp. 271-283.- Chapter 4: Doolin, B. and Lowe, A. (2002), "To reveal is to critique: actor-network theory and critical information systems research," JIT , Vol. 17, 69-78-. Chapter 5: Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Janson, M., and Brown, A. (2002), "The rationality framework for a critical study of information systems, JIT , Vol. 17, pp. 215-227.- PART II. GROUNDED THEORY APPROACHES. - Chapter 6: Urquhart, C. and Fernandez, W. (2013), "Using grounded theory method in information systems: the researcher as blank slate and other myths," JIT, Vol. 28, pp. 224-236.- Chapter 7: Seidel, S., and Urquhart, C. (2013), "On emergence and forcing in information systems groundedtheory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin," JIT, Vol. 28, pp. 237-260.- PART III. HISTORICAL APPROACHES. - Chapter 8: Land, F. (2010), "The use of history in IS research: an opportunity missed?" JIT , Vol. 25, pp. 385-394.- Chapter 9: Mitev, N., de Vaujany, F.X. (2012), "Seizing the opportunity: towards a historiography of information systems," JIT, Vol. 27, pp. 110-124-. Chapter 10: Bonner, W. (2013), "History and IS - Broadening our view and understanding: Actor-Network Theory as a methodology," JIT , Vol. 28, pp. 111-123.