logo
logo
x
바코드검색
BOOKPRICE.co.kr
책, 도서 가격비교 사이트
바코드검색

인기 검색어

일간
|
주간
|
월간

실시간 검색어

검색가능 서점

도서목록 제공

2023년 상반기판 형사소송법 1년간 최신판례정리

2023년 상반기판 형사소송법 1년간 최신판례정리

(22.07.01-23.06.15)

신호진 (지은이)
문형사
8,000원

일반도서

검색중
서점 할인가 할인률 배송비 혜택/추가 실질최저가 구매하기
알라딘 로딩중
yes24 로딩중
교보문고 로딩중
11st 로딩중
영풍문고 로딩중
쿠팡 로딩중
쿠팡로켓 로딩중
G마켓 로딩중
notice_icon 검색 결과 내에 다른 책이 포함되어 있을 수 있습니다.

중고도서

검색중
서점 유형 등록개수 최저가 구매하기
로딩중

eBook

검색중
서점 정가 할인가 마일리지 실질최저가 구매하기
로딩중

책 이미지

2023년 상반기판 형사소송법 1년간 최신판례정리
eBook 미리보기

책 정보

· 제목 : 2023년 상반기판 형사소송법 1년간 최신판례정리 (22.07.01-23.06.15)
· 분류 : 국내도서 > 수험서/자격증 > 인문/사회/법(고등고시) > 변호사시험 > 형사소송법
· ISBN : 9791166871290
· 쪽수 : 89쪽
· 출판일 : 2023-07-06

책 소개

2022년 7월부터 2023년 6월까지 1년간 간행된 대법원 형법 판례와 2022년 1월 이후에 나온 미간행판례를 정리한 교재이다.

목차

…… 형 사 소 송 법 ……
[1] 수사의 개시····································································································· 3
1. 부재자 재산관리인의 고소권 (大判 2021도2488)···················································· 3
[2] 대인적 강제수사······························································································· 5
2. 현행범인 체포의 요건 (大判 2021도12213) <미간행>············································· 5
[3] 대물적 강제수사······························································································· 7
3. 압수·수색영장에 기재된 범죄 혐의사실과의 관련성 (大判 2019도10309) <미간행>····· 7
4. 원격지 서버 저장정보에 대한 압수·수색의 적법성 (大決 2020모735)······················· 10
5. 원격지 서버에 저장된 정보에 대한 압수의 적법성 여부 (大判 2022도1452) <미간행>······················································································································ 12
6. 압수·수색절차의 적법성 (大決 2019모2584)························································· 14
7. 정보저장매체에 대한 압수의 절차와 방법 (大判 2022도2960)································ 17
8. 압수·수색절차의 적법성 (大決 2016모587)··························································· 19
9. 임의제출된 정보저장매체에 대한 압수·수색의 범위 (大判 2016도9596) <미간행>····· 21
10. 「통신비밀보호법」상 전기통신 감청의 의미 (大判 2022도9877)····························· 24
11. 통신비밀보호법상의 ‘공개되지 아니한 타인간의 대화’의 의미 (大判 2020도1007)··· 26
12. 수사기관의 영장 없는 사진촬영의 적법성 (大判 2018도8161)······························· 28
[4] 공소제기의 방식······························································································ 30
13. 공소사실 중 범죄의 ‘일시’의 기재 정도 (大判 2022도8257)································· 30
[5] 공소시효········································································································ 31
14. 공소시효의 연장과 소급효 (大判 2020도1153)···················································· 31
15. 공소제기 후 형사처분을 면할 목적으로 국외에 있는 경우 (大判 2020도13547)······ 33
16. 형사소송법 제253조 제3항의 ‘형사처분을 면할 목적’의 의미 (大判 2019도5925)···· 34
[6] 공판심리의 범위······························································································ 36
17. 공소장변경의 필요성이 없음에도 공소장을 변경한 경우 (大判 2022도10564)········· 36
[7] 증거조사와 강제처분························································································ 37
18. 구속집행정지의 조건으로서 전자장치의 부착 여부 (大決 2022모1799)··················· 37
[8] 증거법의 기본개념··························································································· 39
19. 간접증거에 의한 증명의 정도 (大判 2022도2236)··············································· 39
[9] 증명의 기본원칙······························································································ 41
20. 증명력의 판단방법 (大判 2022도11245, 2022보도52)········································· 41
21. ‘위드마크 공식’의 적용을 위한 증명의 방법 (大判 2021도14074)·························· 43
22. 강간죄에서 피해자의 진술의 증명력 (大判 2018도19037) <미간행>······················ 45
23. 성폭력 피해자의 진술의 신빙성 판단방법 (大判 2021도3451)······························· 47
24. 성폭력 피해자의 진술의 증명력 판단방법 등 (大判 2020도11185)························ 49
[10] 전문법칙······································································································ 51
25. 공사사실 중 범죄 ‘일시’ 특정의 정도 및 검찰 피의자신문조서의 증거능력 (大判 2023도2102)··············································································································· 51
26. 수사과정에서 작성한 진술서의 증거능력 (大判 2022도9510)································ 53
27. 진술조서의 실질적 진정성립을 증명할 수 있는 영상녹화물의 의미 (大判 2022도364)···················································································································· 55
28. 세무공무원이 작성한 범칙혐의자심문조서의 증거능력 (大判 2022도8824)·············· 59
[11] 재판의 기본개념···························································································· 61
29. 재판장의 판결 변경 선고의 적법성 (大判 2017도3884)········································ 61
30. 재판서에 법관의 날인이 누락된 경우 (大判 2021도17427) <미간행>····················· 63
[12] 상소의 일반이론···························································································· 64
31. 공시송달의 적법요건과 상소권회복청구의 적법 여부 (大決 2022모439)················· 64
32. 상소권회복청구의 적법성 (大決 2023모350)······················································· 66
33. 집행유예취소결정에 대한 즉시항고권회복청구에 재소자 특칙의 적용여부 (大決 2022모1004)·················································································································· 67
[13] 항 소··········································································································· 68
34. 항소심에서의 피고인 불출석 재판의 요건 (大判 2022도7940)······························· 68
35. 항소심에서 증인 진술의 신빙성에 대해서 제1심과 다른 판단을 하는 경우 (大判 2017도11582)············································································································· 69
36. 증언의 신빙성 판단이 제1심과 항소심이 다른 경우 (大判 2022도14645)··············· 71
37. 형사소송법 제364조의2에서 ‘항소한 공동피고인’의 범위 (大判 2021도10579)········ 73
[14] 상 고··········································································································· 74
38. 상고이유서를 제출해야 하는 자 (大決 2022도16568)·········································· 74
39. 비약적 상고에 항소로서의 효력의 인정여부 (大判 2021도17131, 2021전도170, 전원합의체 판결)············································································································ 75
[15] 항 고··········································································································· 79
40. 준항고 대상을 특정하기 어려운 경우 법원이 취해야 할 조치 (大決 2022모1566)··· 79
[16] 재 심··········································································································· 81
41. 재심청구의 대상 (大決 2022모509)··································································· 81
[17] 비상상고······································································································ 83
·선고형의 한계를 초과한 경우 (大判 2021오12) <미간행>········································· 83
·선고형의 한계를 초과한 경우 (大判 2021오24) <미간행>········································· 83
[18] 약식절차······································································································ 84
42. 정식재판청구와 정식재판청구권회복청구의 적법요건 (大決 2022모1872)················ 84
[19] 피해자 보호절차···························································································· 86
43. 배상명령과 ‘다른 절차에 따른 손해배상청구’의 관계 (大判 2020도12279)············· 86
[20] 형사보상과 명예회복······················································································ 88
44. 공소기각결정에 대한 형사보상청구기간 (大決 2020모627)··································· 88

저자소개

신호진 (지은이)    정보 더보기
연세대학교 법학과와 고려대학교 대학원을 졸업했다. 연세대, 동국대, 단국대, 건국대, 경북대, 동아대, 전북대, 영남대학교 등에서 형법특강을 담당하였으며, 한국 싸이버대학교(KCU)에서 법학과 교수, 동국대학교 법학과에서 법학과 겸임교수를 역임하였다.
펼치기
이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로,
이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.
이 포스팅은 제휴마케팅이 포함된 광고로 커미션을 지급 받습니다.
도서 DB 제공 : 알라딘 서점(www.aladin.co.kr)
최근 본 책