김남주 시 연구

김남주 시의 탈식민성 연구
1. 서론 ··················································································· 13
2. 분석 텍스트의 확정 ···························································· 16
3. 저항 담론의 다양한 양상들 ················································· 38
1) 예술관에 투영된 탈식민주의적 특성 ········································ 38
2) ‘5월 광주’의 형상화 양상과 민주 정신의 투영 ··························· 57
3) 반미·반파쇼 이념의 형상화 ··················································· 84
4) 반자본주의 의식 ······································································ 95
5) 계급의식 중심의 민중애 ························································· 106
4. 형상화 기법의 특성 ·························································· 124
1) 아이러니와 풍자 ···································································· 124
2) 욕설과 비속어 ······································································· 133
5. 결론 ················································································· 143

패배와 재무장의 변증법
1. 다시 부르는 김남주 ·························································· 151
2. 닫힌 ‘광장’의 혼돈 ··························································· 152
3. 계급적 동지애와 낭만적 사랑 ············································ 155
4. 미제국주의의 침탈에 대한 투쟁 ········································ 160
5. 노동 계급에 대한 유물론적 인식 ······································· 165
6. 끝나지 않은 해방가 ·························································· 168

김남주 시에 투영된 여성 이미지의 양상들
1. 서론 ················································································· 173
2. 자기 관계 외의 여성에 대한 부정 ······································ 174
1) 부정적 메타포로서의 여성 이미지 ·········································· 174
2) 매매 대상으로서의 여성 이미지 ············································· 178
3. 자기 관계 내의 여성에 대한 긍정 ······································ 184
1) 애인-아내에 나타난 여성 이미지 ············································ 184
2) 어머니에 나타난 여성 이미지 ················································· 187
4. 결론 ················································································· 191

참고문헌 ············································································· 194

당대가 요구하는 문학의 소명을 가장 명확하게 인식하고 그것에 충실했던 김남주의 텍스트가 여성문제에 대해 집중하지 않았으며 여성 이미지 비평의 관점에서 상당한 결함을 드러낸다는 이유로 그의 텍스트 자체를 부정할 수는 없다. 그것은 시대가 호명한 텍스트의 가치뿐만 아니라, 더 나아가 한국문학사의 한 축을 전면적으로 부정하는 결과를 초래할 것이 자명하기 때문이다. 다만, 80년대에 창작된 텍스트에 대한 다양한 비평적 접근을 시도하는 이유는 이를 통해 80년대의 민중문학이 지니고 있는 함의, 즉 민족문학 혹은 민중문학으로 규정된 텍스트라 할지라도 그것이 당대의 사회구조적 모순을 전면적으로 포괄하는 데 일정 정도의 한계를 지니고 있음을 확인하는 과정으로 이해하여야 할 것이다.